next up previous contents
Next: The matrix elements of Up: Polarised beams as Jones Previous: Polarised beams as Jones

Getting the Jones matrix from orthogonal antenna patterns

An antenna in the direction tex2html_wrap_inline1010, placed at some point in the focal plane and illuminating the telescope produces a radiation field propagating in the direction tex2html_wrap_inline1004 in the sky:
displaymath1014
where tex2html_wrap_inline1016 is the field amplitude produced by the antenna, while tex2html_wrap_inline1018 and tex2html_wrap_inline1020 are conventional basis vectors forming a right handed orthogonal reference frame with the direction of propagation tex2html_wrap_inline1004. The only property of these vectors that we use, is that they turn by an angle tex2html_wrap_inline952 around tex2html_wrap_inline1004 if the antenna, and therefore tex2html_wrap_inline1010, is rotated by this angle tex2html_wrap_inline952 in the focal plane. The Ludwig III convention is an example satisfying this constraint. If the antenna is rotated by an angle of tex2html_wrap_inline1032 toward the direction Y, the basis vector in the far field reference frame are rotated in the same way:
displaymath1036
the field produced in the same direction tex2html_wrap_inline1004 in the sky becomes:
displaymath1040
In other words an emitter in the focal plane illuminating the telescope with a field tex2html_wrap_inline1042 , produces in the direction tex2html_wrap_inline1004 a radiation field tex2html_wrap_inline1046 given by:
displaymath1048
where the (tex2html_wrap_inline1050) reference frame in the focal plane is defined by the two orthogonal directions of the antenna.

The principle of reciprocity tells us that an incoming radiation field tex2html_wrap_inline1046 in the direction tex2html_wrap_inline1004, produces in the focal plane a field
 equation361
Therefore, by illuminating the telescope in the reverse way with two orthogonal dipoles in the focal plane, and studying their antenna patterns, one is able to evaluate the full polarised lobe as a Jones matrix depending on the direction of an incoming radiation.
equation364
Note that with the matrix in Eq. (18), one is able to compute the Jones matrix in any other reference frame (tex2html_wrap_inline1056), rotated by an angle tex2html_wrap_inline952 from (X,Y) in the focal plane, provided the Co-Cross reference frame chosen for the incoming radiation also rotates by the same angle tex2html_wrap_inline952:
equation368
The first and second lines of this matrix give the Co and Cross amplitudes relative to the tex2html_wrap_inline1064 and tex2html_wrap_inline1066 directions respectively.

The action of a polarimeter placed behind, at an angle tex2html_wrap_inline952 from the X axis, is obtained as the product tex2html_wrap_inline1072, where tex2html_wrap_inline1074 is given by the expression (13). If, as argued by Fosalba [Fosalba2000], the copolar amplitude depend only very weakly on the direction of the dipole in the focal plane, and the crosspolar amplitudes are small, then the Jones matrix is approximately:
 equation384
When working with bolometers, Mueller matrices are more illuminating, as they give directly the transformation of the Stokes parameters. The Mueller matrix associated to the Jones matrix (21) is, to first order in tex2html_wrap_inline1076 and tex2html_wrap_inline1078 and assuming that the induced circular polarisation is negligible (The Jones matrix is nearly real):
 equation389
Multiplying by the Mueller matrix of the polarimeter (Eq. 14), one finds the coefficients:
 equation398
where tex2html_wrap_inline968 and tex2html_wrap_inline970

If tex2html_wrap_inline1078 and tex2html_wrap_inline1076 are zero, then one is back to equation (17), up to a factor tex2html_wrap_inline1088 which is the transmission of the telescope. The whole instrument behaves as a polarimeter in the direction tex2html_wrap_inline952 in the focal plane. If tex2html_wrap_inline1078 and tex2html_wrap_inline1076 are small but not zero, the angle tex2html_wrap_inline952 is changed to tex2html_wrap_inline1098 and tex2html_wrap_inline1100 gets a small contribution, proportional to tex2html_wrap_inline1102.

Still, the result of Fosalba [Fosalba2000] should be checked for all feed positions and is probably a bad approximation for far side-lobes. Therefore we think that the polarised beams as complete Jones matrices (four complex amplitudes up to a phase) should be evaluated for each feed, thus allowing to play with the polariser directions and to choose the optimal ones.


next up previous contents
Next: The matrix elements of Up: Polarised beams as Jones Previous: Polarised beams as Jones

Jean Kaplan
Wed Sep 19 13:04:59 CEST 2001